.svg)
When it comes to increasing breast volume, two popular options are fat transfer and breast implants. Fat transfer offers a more natural and subtle augmentation, while implants guarantee a predictable volume and more remarkable. The choice depends on the individual expectations and needs of each patient.
The differences between these methods are not only in the final size, but also in the shape, texture and recovery process. Fat transfer uses the body's own tissue, which avoids complications related to foreign materials, but may offer less volume gain.
On the other hand, implants allow for more precise customization in size and shape, but with their own risks such as the possibility of rejection or long-term complications.
Fat transfer, or lipografting, involves removing fat from the patient's own body using liposuction. This fat is processed to remove impurities and then injected into the breasts to increase their volume.
This procedure is less invasive than implant placement and is considered more natural, since it uses its own tissue. In addition, it can improve body contour by removing fat from unwanted areas, such as the abdomen or thighs.
The transferred fat must be handled carefully to ensure that it takes and stays in place. In some cases, it is necessary to repeat the treatment to obtain the desired volume, due to partial resorption of the graft.
Breast implants are devices made of a silicone cover filled with saline solution or silicone gel. They are surgically placed to give volume and immediate shape to the bust. There are different sizes, shapes and textures of implants to suit the patient's anatomy and preferences. Surgery allows for a more predictable and long-lasting increase compared to fat transfer.
However, implants require an incision and may involve more surgical risks, such as capsular contracture or ruptures. Both treatments, fat transfer and implants, have clear advantages and limitations that should be considered before breast augmentation surgery.
The two options for increasing breast volume have different characteristics that affect patient experience and outcomes. However, both potential complications and limitations must be considered when choosing each method.
Fat transfer uses the body's own adipose tissue, which practically eliminates the risk of rejection or allergic reactions, since no foreign materials are introduced. This technique offers very natural results, both in shape and texture to the touch, avoiding the firmness that implants can generate in some cases.
An additional benefit is that the procedure includes prior liposuction to remove fat from areas such as the abdomen, hips or thighs, which improves body contour and can refine the silhouette.
By not using synthetic materials, risks associated with implants are avoided, such as capsular contracture — a complication in which the scar tissue surrounding the implant hardens, causing pain, discomfort or aesthetic deformity — as well as the rupture or filtration of the contents of the implant.
However, this technique has limitations: the fat transferred does not always survive 100%, since some of it can be reabsorbed by the body in the following months. This can reduce the volume achieved and, in some cases, require additional sessions to maintain or achieve the desired size. In addition, its viability depends on whether the patient has enough donor fat to extract.
Implants allow for a faster, more predictable and significant increase in volume. From the start, patients and surgeons can select a specific size, shape and projection, making it easy to plan an outcome in line with aesthetic expectations. This option is ideal for those who are looking for a noticeable change or do not have enough fatty tissue for a transfer.
Silicone implants are the most popular due to their soft touch and natural appearance, and they exist in different shapes (round or anatomical) and textures (smooth or textured), adapting to different aesthetic objectives and body characteristics.
Unlike fat transfer, the initial result does not depend on biological factors such as cell survival, providing greater control over the final volume.
However, implants are not permanent. Although they can last for many years, they may eventually require replacement due to wear, rupture, or body changes over time. In addition, there is a risk of specific complications such as capsular contracture, implant displacement, visible undulations in patients with little breast tissue, or infection in rare cases.
When deciding between fat grafting or breast implants, there is no single right answer: the best option will depend on your personal goals, your anatomy and, above all, on an honest and close evaluation with a surgeon who understands your expectations.
With more than 15 years of experience, Dr. Allan Ceballos distinguishes himself by accompanying his patients at every stage of the process, offering a natural, artistic approach focused on enhancing your unique beauty.
If you're looking for moderate volume gain, with subtle results and a more natural appearance, fat transfer may be an excellent option. On the other hand, if your goal is a more noticeable enlargement, with defined projection and symmetry, implants offer greater predictability in terms of size and shape. Dr. Ceballos focuses on achieving results that feel in harmony with your body, avoiding exaggerations and ensuring that you feel yourself, only safer.
Dr. Ceballos will guide you honestly, explaining every detail of the procedures, recovery times and potential risks, so you can make an informed decision aligned with your true desires. Because undergoing cosmetic surgery should not be a source of anxiety, but rather a transformative and liberating experience.
Book your consultation today and find out how a warm, artistic and safe approach can make all the difference.
Fat transfer and implants offer different risks, costs and long-term results. They also vary in the recovery and the final appearance of breast augmentation. These differences are important for those considering which method is best suited to their needs.
After a mastectomy, the choice depends on the state of the tissue and the patient's preferences. Implants provide immediate, structured volume. Fat transfer can help improve shape and texture, especially in combination with implants.
Recovery after fat transfer is usually faster and less painful. You will usually be able to resume normal activities within a week. On the other hand, with implants, recovery can be longer, with more discomfort and restrictions.
The volume may decrease somewhat due to the natural resorption of some of the transferred fat. Results are usually stable if there are no major changes in weight. The shape remains natural, although it may be less dramatic than with implants.
Fat transfer offers a more natural look and feel because it uses its own tissue. Implants may be firmer and show visible edges in some cases. However, combining both methods can achieve an improved aesthetic and natural result.
.png)
9 A. M. - 8 P. M.
Monday - Friday
Closed
Saturday - Sunday